KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT FOR ENTREPRENEURIAL ECOSYSTEMS AND THE COGNITIVE GAPS PROBLEM
The article is devoted to the problem of the knowledge management in entrepreneurial ecosystems with the participation of universities, where knowledge exchanges should be intensive. It was important for our study to define, is the notion of a commodity could be used to knowledge. It is shown that the use of tacit and explicit knowledge as objects of management conceals the cognitive gaps between subjects' consciousness and texts or other material presentations of information. Author proposed to supplement the subjective component of knowledge management with the notion of operative knowledge, which corresponds to the concept of knowledge as justified true belief. Operative knowledge may be defined as all of the words and phrases in consciousness, which appear when author seek an optimal version to transmit mental knowledge into explicit material form. By using the concept of operative knowledge, author is define the cognitive gap of actualization between tacit and operational knowledge, and also the cognitive gap of externalization between operational knowledge and the material form of information. It should be noted, that the concepts of operative knowledge and cognitive gaps give the reason to believe, that information management concepts have a more substantiated cognitive basis than the knowledge management ones.Keywords: knowledge management, entrepreneurial ecosystem, commodity, university, operational knowledge, cognitive gap, information, belief
Повний текст:PDF (English)
Fedulova, L. (2016). Innovatsiyna ekosystema universytetu [University innovation ecosystem]. Visnyk KNTEU, 4, 162–177.
Porev, S.M. & Sandyga, I.V. (2016). Shliakh nauky universytetu [The Way of University Science]. Kyiv: Khimdzhest.
Mason, C. & Brown, R. (2014). Entrepreneurial ecosystems and growth oriented entrepreneurship (Final Report to OECD). Paris: OECD.
Stam, E. (2015). Entrepreneurial Ecosystems and Regional Policy: A Sympathetic Critique. European Planning Studies 23(9): 1759-1769.
Stam, E. & Spigel, B. (2016). Entrepreneurial Ecosystems. USE Discussion paper series nr: 16-13. UU USE Tjalling C. Koopmans Research Institute.
Guerrero, M., Urbano, D., Fayolle, A., Klofsten, M., & Mian, S. (2016). Entrepreneurial Universities: Emerging Models in the New Social and Economic Landscape. Small Business Econ., 47(3), 551-563.
Annanperä, E., Liukkunen, K. & Markkula, J. (2016). Managing Emerging Business Ecosystems – A Knowledge Management Viewpoint, In: Proceedings of AMCIS 2016, San Diego.
Bandera, C., Keshtkar, F., Bartolacci, M., Neerudu, S., & Passerini, K. (2017). Knowledge management and the entrepreneur: Insights from Ikujiro Nonaka's Dynamic Knowledge Creation model (SECI). International Journal of Innovation Studies, (1), 163-174.
Dalkir, K. (2011). Knowledge Management in Theory and Practice (second ed.). Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
Girard, J & Girard, J. (2015). Defining knowledge management: Toward an applied compendium. Online Journal of Applied Knowledge Management, 3(1).
Polanyi, M. (1958). Personal knowledge. Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy. London: Routledge.
Nonaka, I., Toyama, R. & Hirata, T. (2008). Managing Flow. A Process Theory of the Knowledge-Based Firm. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Wilson, T.D. (2002). The nonsense of 'knowledge management'. Information Research, 8(1).
Lambe, P. (2011). The unacknowledged parentage of knowledge management. Journal of knowledge management, 15(2), 175-197.
Radder, H. (2017). Which scientific knowledge is a common good? Social epistemology, 31(5), 431-450.
Clarysse, B., Wright, M., & Bruneel, J. (2014). Creating Value in Ecosystems: Crossing the Chasm between, Knowledge and Business Ecosystems. Research Policy, 43(7): 1164–1176.
Valkokari, K. (2015) Business, Innovation, and Knowledge Ecosystems: How They Differ and How to Survive and Thrive within Them. Technology Innovation Management Review, 5(8), 17-24.
Lee, J. (2018). The effects of knowledge sharing on individual creativity in higher education institutions: socio-technical view. Administrative Sciences, 8 (21); doi:10.3390/admsci8020021
Gonsales R.V.D. & Martins, M.F. (2017). Knowledge Management Process: a theoretical-conceptual research. Gest. Prod., São Carlos, 24(2), 248-265.
Adriaans, P. & van Benthem, J., (Eds). (2008). Philosophy of Information. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Holford, W. D. (2018). Knowledge flows in the form of entanglement and ‘cuts’: an agential realist perspective on knowledge construction phenomena within an aircraft manufacturing workplace. Proc. of 51st HICSS, Hawaii, 2018. 4233-4242.
Steup, M. (2018). "Epistemology", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2018 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2018/entries/epistemology/>.
Mingers, J. & Standing, C. (2014). What is Information such that there can be Information Systems? Working paper series, № 302, Kent: Kent Business School.
Etzkowitz, H. (2003). Research groups as ‘quasi-firms’: the invention of the entrepreneurial university. Research policy. 32, 109–121.
Пристатейна бібліографія ГОСТ
Copyright (c) 2018 Sergey Porev
Ця робота ліцензована Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.