EUROPEAN CHALLENGES FOR UKRAINIAN INNOVATION POLICY AND TECHNICAL UNIVERSITIES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24025/2306-4420.0.47.2017.119857Ключові слова:
innovation, challenge, entrepreneurship, research & development, research excellence, societal impact, brain drain, entrepreneurial ecosystemАнотація
The article deals with problems related to research excellence for innovation and their societal impact, «brain drain» and the formation of entrepreneurial ecosystems. These problems already exist in Ukraine, but they can become exacerbated on the way of its integration into European structures, if the innovation policy does not change. The indicators of research, development and innovation activity in Ukraine and experience of several EU countries are analyzed. The recommendations of the Horizon 2020 Policy Support Facility Panel (2016) and the proposals of the European League of Research Universities (2017) are considered.
It is proved that these problems in the process of the European integration movement are exacerbated and can be considered as challenges for the national innovation system and for individual universities. However, it is noted that Ukraine can use the existing positive experience of European countries to overcome similar problems. At the same time, new policies and management will have to counteract the existing approaches, it is also necessary to make changes in the legislation.
In order to overcome these challenges, it was proposed to implement public policy and management measures that were proposed in the author's previous work, in particular to carry out assessment of scientists according to the UK experience, but somewhat simplified, and to introduce a performance based funding system.
Посилання
Porev O. S., Porev S. M. (2015) Pre-incubators of universities as an instrument of innovative activity and preparation of students for entrepreneurship. Proceedings of Cherkasy state technological university. Series: Economic sciences. Issue 40, part 1. P. 71-81.
Porev S. M., Sandiga I. V. Path of University Science: [monograph]. Kyiv: Khimzhest, 2016. 112 p.
Austers A. Latvia: permanent departure / A. Schellinger, ed. Brain drain – brain gain: European labour markets in times of crisis. Bonn: Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung, 2017. P. 53–59.
Bornmann L., Marx W. How should the societal impact of research be generated and measured? A proposal for a simple and practicable approach to allow interdisciplinary comparisons. Scientometrics. 2014. № 98. p. 211–219. DOI 10.1007/s11192-013-1020-x
Сlark B. R. Sustaining change in universities. Continuities in case studies and concepts. Berkshire: Open University Press, 2004. 225 p.
Cloete N., Bunting I. (2013) Strengthening knowledge production in universities: Five South African case studies. OECD. IHERD report. Dec. 51 p.
Cooke P., Uranga M. G., Etxebarria G. (1988) Regional systems of innovation: an evolutionary perspective. Environment and Planning A. Vol. 30. P. 1563–1584.
Etzkowitz H. (2003) Research groups as ‘quasi-firms’: the invention of the entrepreneurial university. Research Policy. Vol. 32. Р. 109–121.
European Commission. Peer review of the Ukrainian research and innovation system. Horizon 2020 Policy Support Facility. Luxembourg: EU Publications Office. 2016. 79 p.
Gibb A., Haskins, G., Hannon P. D., Robertson I. Leading the entrepreneurial university: meeting the entrepreneurial development needs of higher education. Coventry, UK: National Centre for Entrepreneurship in Education, 2009. 54 р.
IMF. International migration: recent trends, economic impacts, and policy implications. Staff background paper for G20 surveillance note. IMF, 2015. 31 p.
IMF. Emigration and its economic impact on eastern europe. Discussion note. IMF, 2016. 48 p.
INSEAD. The Global talent competitiveness index 2017 / B. Lanvin, P. Evans, еds. Fontainebleau, France: INSEAD, 2016. 359 p.
Kaczmarczyk P. Poland: large migration outflows and skill-mismatch / A. Schellinger, ed. Brain drain – brain gain: European labour markets in times of crisis. Bonn: Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung, 2017. P. 33–43.
Lawton Smith H. Entrepreneurship policies and the development of regional innovation systems: theory, policy and practice. CIMR Working Paper. 2017, No. 36. 34 p.
League of European research universities. Productive interactions: societal impact of academic research in the knowledge society. Technical report, LERU position paper. 2017. 32 р.
Lundvall B-Å., Johnson B., Andersen E. S., Dalum B. National systems of production, innovation and competence building. Research Policy. 2002. Vol. 31 (2). P. 213–231.
Milio S., Lattanzi R., Casadio F. et al. Brain drain, brain exchange and brain circulation. The case of Italy viewed from a global perspective. Aspen: Aspen Institute, 2012. 47 p.
Moore J. F. Predators and prey: a new ecology of competition. Harvard Business Review. 1993. Vol. 71 (3). P. 75–86.
Neumeyer X., Corbett A. C. Entrepreneurial ecosystems: weak metaphor or genuine concept? The Great Debates in Entrepreneurship. Published online: 10 Aug 2017. P. 35–45. URL: https://doi.org/10.1108/S1048-473620170000027005
Nowotny H., Scott Р., Gibbons М. Introduction: ‘Mode 2’ revisited: the new production of knowledge. Minerva. 2003. 41 (3). Р. 179–194.
Qian H., Acs Z. J., Stough R. R. Regional systems of entrepreneurship: the nexus of human capital, knowledge and new firm formation. Journal of Economic Geography. 2012. P. 1–29.
Schellinger A. Foreword Brain drain – brain gain: European labour markets in times of crisis / A. Schellinger, ed. Bonn: Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung, 2017. P. 3.
Schwab K. The Global Competitiveness Report 2015–2016. Geneva: World Economic Forum, 2015. 403 p.
Schwab K. The Global Competitiveness Report 2016–2017. Geneva: World Economic Forum, 2016. 400 p.
Schwab K. The Global Competitiveness Report 2017–2018. Geneva: World Economic Forum, 2017. 393 p.
Semiv L., Hvozdovych Y. The intellectual migration of the youth in Ukraine: the backgrounds for ‘brain circula-tion’. Journal of International Studies. 2012. Vol. 5, No 2. P. 72–81.
Teney C. Conclusion. Brain drain – brain gain: European labour markets in times of crisis / A. Schellinger, ed. Bonn: Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung, 2017. P. 85–92.
UNESCO statistics. URL: http://data.uis.unesco.org/
World Bank. Doing business 2018: reforming to create jobs. Washington, DC: World Bank, 2018. 312 p. DOI: 10.1596/978-1-4648-1146-3
##submission.downloads##
Номер
Розділ
Ліцензія
Авторське право (c) 2019 Сергій Миколайович Порев
Ця робота ліцензується відповідно до Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Автори, які публікуються у цьому журналі, погоджуються з наступними умовами:
Автори залишають за собою право на авторство своєї роботи та передають журналу право першої публікації цієї роботи на умовах ліцензії Creative Commons Attribution License, котра дозволяє іншим особам вільно розповсюджувати опубліковану роботу з обов'язковим посиланням на авторів оригінальної роботи та першу публікацію роботи у цьому журналі.
Автори мають право укладати самостійні додаткові угоди щодо неексклюзивного розповсюдження роботи у тому вигляді, в якому вона була опублікована цим журналом (наприклад, розміщувати роботу в електронному сховищі установи або публікувати у складі монографії), за умови збереження посилання на першу публікацію роботи у цьому журналі.
Політика журналу дозволяє і заохочує розміщення авторами в мережі Інтернет (наприклад, у сховищах установ або на особистих веб-сайтах) рукопису роботи, як до подання цього рукопису до редакції, так і під час його редакційного опрацювання, оскільки це сприяє виникненню продуктивної наукової дискусії та позитивно позначається на оперативності та динаміці цитування опублікованої роботи (див. The Effect of Open Access).
